Over the past year I have learned a lot about an amazing and beautiful woman named Dr. Alveda King. She is a niece of the late civil rights activist Martin Luther King, Jr. and daughter of the late civil rights activist Rev. A. D. King. Read this, from Wikipedia:
[King] is the director of African-American Outreach at the Roman Catholic pro-life group Priests for Life. She is currently a Senior Fellow at the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution, a conservative Washington, D.C. think-tank She is a former member of the Georgia House of Representatives and the founder of King for America. King is a pro-life speaker and often speaks on college campuses about abortion issues. After having two abortions herself, Ms. King joined the pro-Life movement, crusading to offer women alternatives to abortion.
Dr. King is obviously a Christian. The King for America website states the following:
"Uniting the dream of civil rights
and moral justice for abundant life."
"Where Jesus Christ is Lord."
Dr. King is scheduled to speak at "8/28 - Restoring Honor", a massive effort for a vision that Glenn Beck has had for a revival for American values; specifically, faith, hope and charity. He has worked with Dr. King over the past year to bring about an awakening in this country, very much inspired by Dr. Martin Luther King's "I have a dream" (which you should watch. again.) historic moment at the Lincoln Memorial on August 28, 1963.
The criticism received regarding the event, especially from the uber-liberal Democrat Leftists elites has been nothing less than astounding. It suddenly occurred to me that these people likely sound just like the critics of Dr. King when he spoke those amazing words almost 50 years ago.
In his piece he suggests that conservative zombies are so dumb they don't know the difference between Martin Luther King and Glenn Beck by sourcing with the George Soros media brown-nosers at Media Matters:
Here's one more from Salon.com, who is incredibly disrespectful of Dr. King by suggesting she's the new conservative movement's darling and calls her a "foe" of those who support abortion and homosexual marriage:
Glenn Beck is smitten with Alveda King, a fundamentalist Christian and outspoken foe of gay rights and abortion -- and niece of slain civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.
Her statements have garnered her increasing press attention, and she was even included by Keith Olbermann in a recent "Worst Persons in the World" segment.
Incidentally, all proceeds and donations for this event, as well as a prayer vigil held on August 27 at the Kennedy Center, are going for the Special Operations Warrior Foundation. This is an organization that "provides support and assistance to the U. S. military's special operations community, which consists of Army Special Forces (Green Berets), the Army's 75th Ranger Regiment, the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, Navy Small Boat Teams, Navy SEALs, Air Force Combat Controllers, Air Force rotary and fixed wing squadrons, and Marine Corps special operations personnel." And of course, this has garnered criticism and insults as well.
Henry Rollins of Vanity Fair Daily online "gave" the event the "Comedy Critic's Choice" award, yet insinuating it is just a gathering of angry white people. What?
"I get the feeling that this pitiful gathering will be more about angry white people who think they have lost something. These are people who can’t handle the fact that with time, things change. The restoration of honor they strive for is nothing more than regaining a perceived position of superiority they feel is rightfully theirs, that has been taken away."
Rollins also quotes former Georgia Senator Richard Russell "speaking on behalf of the Southern Block, or the southern states if you will, about the Civil Rights Act." What he conveniently leaves out is that Senator Russell, speaking for that "Block" had co-authored the racist Southern Manifesto and was, like the other 99 "Block" members who signed it, a liberal DEMOCRAT:
“We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our states.”
As the leftist liberal media and elites get nastier and uglier, and they will, as we get closer to the election we should know that they are acting this way because they have become defensive. They have backed themselves into a corner. Their tactics of lies and insults, their Rules for Radicals playbook, isn't working. The Socialists and uber-Democrats are looking so foolish. The truth is what works. This weekend's events hosted by Glenn Beck and all those participating is a giant leap forward toward an awakening that started oh-so-slowly just a couple of years ago. The bad guys continue to lose ground. One of these days those bad guys will remember: It's the good guys who always win.
This is exciting. The new RightNetwork is ready to launch on September 8. It's already received snarky elitist media criticism from the liberal leftists. As it's launch date nears, there will be increasing volume from the left-wing whiners because the the lefty-loonies are very afraid. Is there a pool started for bets on who in the Yellow-Stream Media will be the first to call RightNetwork a "racist" channel?
Their motto: "All That's Right With the World." It will be. Just in time.
While doing a little research this morning I came across this:
"Muslim Americans Answer the Call is
a national grassroots effort to encourage and
empower every Muslim American
to take part in the President's initiative."
The site MuslimServe.org is an arm of the Serve.gov site, where the Federal Government is attempting to galvanize Americans into acts of public service.
Where is ChristianServe.org with a quote from the Bible? Where is JewishServe.org with quotes from the Torah? HinduServe.org or BuddhistServe.org with quote from their from their respected texts? Go ahead and look; they're not there.
"The President is calling on all Americans..."? Really. Let me know, please, if your faith call shows up. Not that I'm looking for the Federal Government to tell me how to serve. Only that they might not really be pandering to a certain religion, or even (GASP!) mixing church and state.
There is an annual protest happening right about this time of year. It is by women who believe that their rights are violated because men can go topless in public and women cannot. They are calling for, even demanding, what they call "top freedom." (insert eye-rolling emotion here).
Puuuuhhh-leeezze.
While most people probably envision this when they think of this group's protest show and tell:
Sorry, but here's what you'll really get:
hey...is this cheating?
Now, I'm certain each of the above pictured women are beautiful in their own unique ways...but I don't particularly care to see something like this (these?) in public everywhere I go on a regular basis. I have my own, thank you, and a mirror.
Breasts are functional, yes. But the truth of them is (are?) that after babies, breast feeding, a few decades of aging and ill-fitting bras, they're just not what they were when they started out, unless you invest in major reconstruction. So, I'm gonna be a predictable conservative here and request...no, demand! That we keep the tatas under wraps. "Top Freedom?" Really? Speaking of slippery slopes...
I just discovered this conservative music artist this morning on Breitbart.com. Click, watch, and listen. Then, go over to Joe Dan's YouTube Channel and check out the rest of the music. Joe Dan also has a gig on Kansas Radio KMBZ, so you know there's some honest talent here. He's got some great political ads, too.
If you're a singer in the Kansas City Area, Joe is looking for you. I envisioned Krista
(ADD moment: "envisioned doesn't seem like the right word, since in my head I was hearing the music, not seeing it. Anybody know what the proper terminology is?)
Branch, who sings "I am America" belting out some of his songs. In other words, keeping with the new tradition of the Rising Conservative Woman, a female voice. But of course, it would be the artist's call, not mine.
Awesome act, Mr. Joe Dan Media. You had me at "eatin' liberals for breakfast."
Just wondering...did anyone catch this in the "Main Stream" Media? I didn't, but then, I don't watch them on television here, nor do I visit their websites. The Fox News Channel made mention of it, but I don't include them in the MSM category.
This isn't the first time this has happened anyway. The hanging bodies that is. Google Mexican Drug Cartel Murders in "Images" with the Safe-search mode off. Glenn Beck also has pictures on his website if you want to see how specific this violence is. It's extremely graphic, so if you really want to look, be forewarned.
Is it any wonder why Gov. Brewer of Arizona along with 22 other states including my own state of Texas has drafted and is considering legislation regarding the prevention of this kind of horror coming across our borders? How many days until we see an Oliver Cromwell type display on US Soil?
Four decapitated and mutilated corpses were strung from a bridge in a popular getaway outside the Mexican capital, the latest atrocity as the country battles an escalating drugs war.
The bodies of the four young men were discovered hanging upside down by their feet from a bridge near the wealthy area of Cuernavaca, a leafy city about an hour outside Mexico City, where many of the nation's elite own homes.
The victims' genitals, index fingers and heads had been cut off, according to the attorney general's office. Their heads and genitals were found nearby, along with a handmade sign, the statement said.
"This will happen to everyone that helps the traitor Edgar Valdes," the placard read, referring to a leading drug capo.
It was signed CPS, the initials of the South Pacific Cartel, a relatively new drug gang that has claimed responsibility for other gruesome killings.
Drug violence has escalated across Mexico as President Felipe Calderon goes after powerful cartels and as rival gangs fight over turf. More than 28,000 people have died in drugs violence since Calderon took office in 2006.
While much of the bloodshed is centered in northern Mexico, violence has climbed in Cuernavaca, a once-quiet colonial city, since security forces killed a top drug lord, Arturo Beltran Leyva, in a shootout there in December.
His death kicked off a power struggle within his cartel, and rival gangs have been seeking to co-opt his territory.
Valdez, a Mexican-American known as "La Barbie" due to his blond hair, is a leading contender to head the Beltran Leyva cartel.
The murdered young men appeared to have been small-time local drug dealers killed by a rival gang.
As of this posting, the 19 year-old-driver of this vehicle has survived this 100-mph crash with very serious injuries. I pray he makes it. But his accident will provide a brief warning and lesson for my own son who is learning to drive right now. I hope he absorbs the message:
Muslim leaders to abandon plans for Ground Zero community center
Insiders say Muslim spiritual leaders behind the controversial initiative are considering giving up on the former World Trade Center location, in a gesture of appeasement.
After weeks of heated debate over plans for an Islamic community center near Ground Zero - the site of the 9/11 attacks on New York - it seems Muslim leaders will soon back down, agreeing to move to a new site.
The decision follows a high-profile campaign against the project that included advertisements on New York buses showing images of the burning Twin Towers, an iconic landmark razed when al-Qaida terrorists flew packed passenger planes into them in 2001. The New York Republican party is also said to be planning a hostile television campaign.
The site of a planned mosque is shown two blocks from the World Trade Center - Friday, Aug. 13, 2010
Photo by: AP
Sources in New York said on Monday that Muslim religious and business leaders will announce plans to abandon the project in the next few days.
New York Governor David Patterson said last weekend that Muslim leaders had rejected outright his proposal tto swap the site in for another in Manhattan.
But several people familiar with the debate among New York's Islamic activists now claim that the leaders are convinced abandoning the site is preferable to unleashing a wave of bitterness towards Muslims.
They also hope the move will be seen as a show of sensitivity to families of the victims of the 9/11 attacks, and to the American public generally.
Another factor in the apparent climbdown is a lack of funds to pay for construction of the center, estimated to cost a hundred million dollars. Backers hope moving it will lead to a wave of support, accompanied by cash donations.
It is also possible that the decision was also influenced by comments made by U.S. President Barack Obama on Sunday, in which he appeared to reverse an earlier show of support.
Obama said that when he went on record backing the center, he meant only that it was the right of every religious group to establish its own places of worship – but he did not intend to justify building the center specifically at Ground Zero.
Posted on Mon Jul 19 2010 23:50:37 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
The Obama Plan (with the aid of supporters/conspirators)
Many people have been wondering what the Obama administration with the help of certain members of congress and influential, Godless radicals around the world are doing to the United States. In this essay, it will be pointed out that more than likely a specific plan is in place to divide the nation, make an attempt to pull it back together, appear to be the hero in the process and eventually end up with an ultimate disaster and a lot of deaths instead of accomplishing the intended goal.
A lot of people in the nation are outraged (the anger is unprecedented) as they watch decisions made by this administration and/or actions/moves taken which appear to be to the detriment of the good of the nation and of the freedoms of the citizenry. Some knowledgeable individuals have informed the writer that all of the moves are deliberate and part of an overall plan. It appears that President Obama and the individuals in his inner circle which would include not only aforementioned radicals from U.S. history and fringe element members of Congress along with some foreign interests are deliberately trying to provoke those with a conservative, Godly mindset to commit some act of violence which would precipitate armed conflict within the nation between opposing groups and/or the government.
Comments he has made about the people clinging to the “…religion and their guns.”, his support of extremely liberal philosophy such as homosexuality, abortion, illegal immigration and Islam (and others) openly and arrogantly is enraging many in the U.S., even some who supported him in the presidential election. He has taken steps which are obviously and specifically anti-business and ultimately anti-good economy hurting some of the very people who have supported him with votes. He has openly blackmailed BP and has not allowed the corporation to quickly and efficiently stop the oil leak for political and financial gain by demanding they provide funds. He will then claim that HE was responsible for providing the funds and thus “buy” votes with BPs money.
He has on several occasions brought up amnesty for illegal aliens and talk is now he will try to legalize this group through the stroke of the pen instead of legislation in order to effect his will and create new voters for his party to the tune of nearly 30 million (yes, nearly 30 million illegals are actually in the nation – ask anyone who deals with the Hispanic population and they will tell you there are far more than are officially reported by the media, etc.). Why would he do this? Certain members of Congress are also bluntly advocating action/points of view which are precipitating not previously seen anger among many in the U.S. These stances would seem to be counterproductive to securing votes in the upcoming mid-term elections and even the next presidential election. And, neither the President nor his advocates seem to show any remorse about decisions made. Why?
It has been brought to the writer’s attention that this group of people WANTS conservative groups to rebel and commit an act of violence to play into a trap that is being set. They want states like Arizona and Texas to rebel and try to secede and AG Holder quickly stirs the pot every chance he gets.
They believe they can rally the nation to defeat these “radicals” who would be called all sorts of names (already beginning) and “unify” the nation once again under Obama’s leadership, making him a modern day “Abraham Lincoln.” Analogies to this effect have already been attempted earlier with some things that have been written. The Tea Party movement is at present being vilified and any other conservative or group of conservatives is immediately set upon and demonized when trying to establish a proper agenda based on right and wrong.
The solution to this entire problem is a massive uprising of the people to vote this Fall and in the presidential elections later to correct this situation. The nation must return to its moral foundation of Biblical teaching and vote correctly based on a knowledge of what is right. If we begin to fight each other, we will more than likely be subject to invasion by some foreign power and overwhelmed. I don’t think the group behind this mess plans on that and that is a fatal flaw to the entire process. If we have a civil war in this nation it will not be regional or racial. It will be nearly impossible to consistently determine who the enemy is because the war will be ideological and each neighbor has a different point of view. The potential for absolute disaster because of the preceding is tremendous if you think about it. It will almost be every man for himself – a truly horrible civil war situation which would lead to complete societal collapse.
More details could be provided, but this is enough to get the basic idea across. What a tragedy that it has come to this. Many older people are making comments about politics and government that this writer has never heard that generation make and it is truly frightening where we are headed. Americans better wake up and elect some real leaders with real moral backbone or face destruction. We must ourselves return to our moral roots or we will never elect moral people to lead us. May God help us all. TOPICS:News/Current Events KEYWORDS:masterplan; obama; provocation; revolution
Popular conservative blogger Pamela Geller and New York Times bestselling author Robert Spencer sound a wake-up call for Americans to stop the Obama administration from limiting our hard-won freedoms, silencing our democratic voices, and irreparably harming America for generations to come. America is being tested in a way that she has never been tested before.
Since taking the oath of office in January 2009, President Barack Obama has cheered our enemies and demoralized our allies. He is hard at work “remaking” America by destroying the free-market system and nationalizing major segments of our economy, demonizing dissent and restricting freedom of speech, turning against our longtime friends, and above all, subjecting us to the determinations of foreign authorities. In this timely and urgent battle cry, Pamela Geller, founder of the widely popular website www.AtlasShrugs.com, and New York Times bestselling author Robert Spencer team up to expose the Obama administration’s destructive agenda—largely ignored by mainstream media—and rally Americans to protect the sovereignty of a country that is under siege by the highest levels of its own government.
As Americans see their paychecks shrinking every day, Obama ignores our forefathers’ founding principle: individual rights. Instead, he seeks to level the playing field—to transform both the global and national landscape in favor of our enemies—even if it means cutting America off at the knees. He envisions himself as more than just a president of the United States, but as a shaper of the new world order, an internationalist energetically laying the groundwork for global government: the president of the world.
A vital guide to helping conservatives prepare for the tough battles ahead, The Post-American Presidency critically examines the Obama administration’s ominous and revealing moves against our basic freedoms, particularly as he seizes control of the three engines of the American economy: health care, energy, and education. The Shining City on a Hill has gone dark. But America is not dead. The time is NOW to stand up and fight.
From the AP/ Yahoo News:President Barack Obama hosts an iftar dinner, the meal that breaks the dawn-to-dusk fast for Muslims during the holy month of Ramadan, in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, Friday, Aug. 13, 2010.
Earlier this week, we read the news that nearly 70% of Americans oppose the building of the mosque at ground zero. Now, it appears that Captain Kick-A is drastically on the wrong side of the American people, AGAIN….but then, when has he ever been in tune with the American people, and why should he start, now?
President Barack Obama on Friday forcefully endorsed building a mosque near ground zero, saying the country’s founding principles demanded no less.
“As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country,” Obama said, weighing in for the first time on a controversy that has riven New York City and the nation.
And see? Obama, as usual, throws out the ridiculous strawman. Who, pray, is advocating that Muslims be prevented from practicing their religion in this country? Hm? Anybody?
Nobody has a problem with Muslims putting up Mosques. That’s one of the lamer arguments I’ve heard Islamists and their lib allies make.
Nobody is even advocating that the government stop them. They are appealing to their better angels to be sensitive to the feelings of Americans who are understandably offended by the idea.
When we speak of Ground Zero as hallowed ground, what we mean is that it belongs to those who suffered and died there — and that such ownership obliges us, the living, to preserve the dignity and memory of the place, never allowing it to be forgotten, trivialized or misappropriated.
***
America is a free country where you can build whatever you want — but not anywhere. That’s why we have zoning laws. No liquor store near a school, no strip malls where they offend local sensibilities, and, if your house doesn’t meet community architectural codes, you cannot build at all.
These restrictions are for reasons of aesthetics. Others are for more profound reasons of common decency and respect for the sacred. No commercial tower over Gettysburg, no convent at Auschwitz — and no mosque at Ground Zero.
Build it anywhere but there.
The governor of New York offered to help find land to build the mosque elsewhere. A mosque really seeking to build bridges, Rauf’s ostensible hope for the structure, would accept the offer.
But the President is on a roll, let’s hear him out:
“That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances,” he said. “This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable.”
Obama made the comments at an annual dinner in the White House State Dining Room celebrating the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.
Uh huh. Awesome. Another gift to Republicans.
Obama may want to alert Gibsy, though, because he’s been telling people that as far as the administration is concerned, it’s a local matter.